Hi there, friend of mine, ive sold him my B2 ES CPU (8150) sent me really great article to publish! Thanks many times my friend (Peter). This is very interesting info for all.
Clock to clock is FX +/- 20 percents slower/per core in single thread applications then Thuban. Stay tuned, next part of comparision will be in five or six popular games ...
UPDATE for idiots (informal again in comments) - This is clock-clock comparision. FX-8150 has higher default clock then 1100T! Thuban has 3.3-3.7 GHz and FX 3.6-4.2 GHz. If is 1/Core +/- 20 percents slower then Thuban on the same clock, on default clocks (13 percents higher) will be result better ... this is primary 1Core vs 1Core perf comparision. Not CPU vs CPU on default clock ...
PS. For kiddos, check these results with coolalers or chinese, or mine posted before and wake up from your kiddo dreams ...
ATTENTION! I'm not saying this is the final Retail performance, but I have several reasons to believe it is. Performance B0 and B2 at the same frequency does not changed, I have no reason to believe that it will change B2G or BIOS, Agesa code etc. Some another author-reviewer has Retail BOX with CPU in hand, and the performance is identical to the B2 ES. Official AMD Pressdeck talk about performance that is equal to that i show you ... its enough for me.
